Physics and the 2nd Law (Re: Physics Disproves Atheistic Cosmologies)

[Thomas]

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm McMahon

Why don't you argue for yourself, Bob, rather than posting random
U-Tube videos which nobody is going to watch?

Why don't you learn how to manage message filters?

Partly because, part of the time, I'm using a computer which I'm not
allowed to install newsreader software on, and hence I'm using
Google.
Asking me to killfile you seems a pretty feeble answer to my
question.

Feeble is his forte. Killfiling doesn't do all that much good,
though:you still see far too many of his posts in all the replies.

But here's the real kicker. Nobody has ever refuted even one thing
that I've posted.

<cut>

In my physics 101 class a chapter on the second law of thermodynamics
showed that heat always went from the hot side to the cold side so
everything tended towards equilibrium over time, this had to with the
loss of usable every to do work.

In another class, I asked the professor how come this did not go
against evolution. He said the 2nd law applied only to closed systems
so the earth is a open system getting energy from the sun.
Does that mean that everything on the earth, since the earth is an open
system is thiings not subjected to this law? I think i asked the wrong
question.

But what was wrong with the question?

[W.T.S. gnz0The Lamp of Golden Truth!*]

Post by Thomas

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm McMahon

http://youtu.be/NiCec8SiDuI

Why don't you argue for yourself, Bob, rather than posting
random U-Tube videos which nobody is going to watch?

Why don't you learn how to manage message filters?

Partly because, part of the time, I'm using a computer which I'm
not allowed to install newsreader software on, and hence I'm using
Google.
Asking me to killfile you seems a pretty feeble answer to my
question.

Feeble is his forte. Killfiling doesn't do all that much good,
though:you still see far too many of his posts in all the replies.

But here's the real kicker. Nobody has ever refuted even one thing
that I've posted.

In my physics 101 class a chapter on the second law of thermodynamics
showed that heat always went from the hot side to the cold side so
everything tended towards equilibrium over time, this had to with the
loss of usable every to do work.
In another class, I asked the professor how come this did not go
against evolution. He said the 2nd law applied only to closed systems
so the earth is a open system getting energy from the sun.
Does that mean that everything on the earth, since the earth is an
open system is thiings not subjected to this law? I think i asked the
wrong question.
But what was wrong with the question?

Start here:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamic_system>

The second gets to the core of your question.

[Ted]

Post by W.T.S. gnz0The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

Post by Thomas

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm McMahon

http://youtu.be/NiCec8SiDuI

Why don't you argue for yourself, Bob, rather than posting
random U-Tube videos which nobody is going to watch?

Why don't you learn how to manage message filters?

Partly because, part of the time, I'm using a computer which I'm
not allowed to install newsreader software on, and hence I'm using
Google.
Asking me to killfile you seems a pretty feeble answer to my
question.

Feeble is his forte. Killfiling doesn't do all that much good,
though:you still see far too many of his posts in all the replies.

But here's the real kicker. Nobody has ever refuted even one thing
that I've posted.

In my physics 101 class a chapter on the second law of thermodynamics
showed that heat always went from the hot side to the cold side so
everything tended towards equilibrium over time, this had to with the
loss of usable every to do work.
In another class, I asked the professor how come this did not go
against evolution. He said the 2nd law applied only to closed systems
so the earth is a open system getting energy from the sun.
Does that mean that everything on the earth, since the earth is an
open system is thiings not subjected to this law? I think i asked the
wrong question.
But what was wrong with the question?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamic_system>
The second gets to the core of your question.

Physics, huh? Maybe Kurt will want to weigh in on this discussion. He once
told us he was an unemployed physicist. (And if he's still unemployed,
maybe he can get a job disproving atheistic cosmologies.)