Discussion:
Undeniable ruination of news group atheists
(too old to reply)
T***@tcher
2014-10-31 20:05:14 UTC
Permalink
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.

In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
presented to them by ***@.not The challenge was a simple one that they should be
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
felix_unger
2014-10-31 22:11:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. Loading Image...
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The right to free speech includes the right to offend"
Free Lunch
2014-11-01 13:31:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix_unger
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
Could you please make an effort not to carelessly conflate "proof" and
"evidence".

Religions go out of their way to make excuses for why nothing they teach
about gods is supported by evidence. Why should anyone believe a
religious teacher who spends all his time justifying why he teaches
something that he has no evidence for?
m***@.not.
2014-11-04 00:35:10 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 08:31:10 -0500, Free Lunch <***@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
.
Post by Free Lunch
Post by felix_unger
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
Could you please make an effort not to carelessly conflate "proof" and
"evidence".
There's plenty of evidence. Probably every person who believes God exists
has experienced personal evidence in their own lives. They don't mention it much
to atheists since atheists deny that anything is evidence. Atheists are the most
clueless, and they take the easiest road possible even though that road
NECESSARILY involves being very comfortable with blatant dishonesty. Which
brings us back to the consistent FACT that atheists ARE EVIDENCE of God's
existence by being evidence that Satan is having influence on human minds.
Post by Free Lunch
Religions go out of their way to make excuses for why nothing they teach
about gods is supported by evidence.
That's a blatant lie from my pov, since I'm not aware of any. Try backing
your claim up with evidence that you're not lying.
Post by Free Lunch
Why should anyone believe a
religious teacher who spends all his time justifying why he teaches
something that he has no evidence for?
You're trying to "teach" people now. Provide your evidence that any
religious teacher "spends all his time justifying why he teaches something that
he has no evidence for." If you can provide that evidence then we can take it
from there. If/WHEN you can't provide that evidence we'll know that you lied
blatantly about something else you have no evidence for, and then we can take
THAT from there.
Free Lunch
2014-11-04 00:48:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.not.
.
Post by Free Lunch
Post by felix_unger
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
Could you please make an effort not to carelessly conflate "proof" and
"evidence".
There's plenty of evidence.
None.
Post by m***@.not.
Probably every person who believes God exists
has experienced personal evidence in their own lives.
No.
Post by m***@.not.
They don't mention it much
to atheists since atheists deny that anything is evidence. Atheists are the most
clueless, and they take the easiest road possible even though that road
NECESSARILY involves being very comfortable with blatant dishonesty. Which
brings us back to the consistent FACT that atheists ARE EVIDENCE of God's
existence by being evidence that Satan is having influence on human minds.
Tell us about the alleged evidence you know you have.
Post by m***@.not.
Post by Free Lunch
Religions go out of their way to make excuses for why nothing they teach
about gods is supported by evidence.
That's a blatant lie from my pov, since I'm not aware of any. Try backing
your claim up with evidence that you're not lying.
There is no evidence to support any gods. You've made it absolutely
clear that you realize that but are too dishonest to acknowledge it.
Post by m***@.not.
Post by Free Lunch
Why should anyone believe a
religious teacher who spends all his time justifying why he teaches
something that he has no evidence for?
You're trying to "teach" people now. Provide your evidence that any
religious teacher "spends all his time justifying why he teaches something that
he has no evidence for." If you can provide that evidence then we can take it
from there. If/WHEN you can't provide that evidence we'll know that you lied
blatantly about something else you have no evidence for, and then we can take
THAT from there.
You preach a religion that you cannot defend.
felix_unger
2014-11-04 06:03:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Free Lunch
Post by m***@.not.
.
Post by Free Lunch
Post by felix_unger
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
Could you please make an effort not to carelessly conflate "proof" and
"evidence".
There's plenty of evidence.
None.
Post by m***@.not.
Probably every person who believes God exists
has experienced personal evidence in their own lives.
No.
you cannot possibly know what any other person experiences or not, idiot
Post by Free Lunch
Post by m***@.not.
They don't mention it much
to atheists since atheists deny that anything is evidence. Atheists are the most
clueless, and they take the easiest road possible even though that road
NECESSARILY involves being very comfortable with blatant dishonesty. Which
brings us back to the consistent FACT that atheists ARE EVIDENCE of God's
existence by being evidence that Satan is having influence on human minds.
Tell us about the alleged evidence you know you have.
Post by m***@.not.
Post by Free Lunch
Religions go out of their way to make excuses for why nothing they teach
about gods is supported by evidence.
That's a blatant lie from my pov, since I'm not aware of any. Try backing
your claim up with evidence that you're not lying.
There is no evidence to support any gods.
there is, but there's none to support no gods exist
Post by Free Lunch
You've made it absolutely
clear that you realize that but are too dishonest to acknowledge it.
that's another lie
Post by Free Lunch
Post by m***@.not.
Post by Free Lunch
Why should anyone believe a
religious teacher who spends all his time justifying why he teaches
something that he has no evidence for?
You're trying to "teach" people now. Provide your evidence that any
religious teacher "spends all his time justifying why he teaches something that
he has no evidence for." If you can provide that evidence then we can take it
from there. If/WHEN you can't provide that evidence we'll know that you lied
blatantly about something else you have no evidence for, and then we can take
THAT from there.
You preach a religion that you cannot defend.
he doesn't preach any religion. he just argues against the dishonesty of
atheists, as do I
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The right to free speech includes the right to offend"
felix_unger
2014-11-04 05:58:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.not.
..
Post by Free Lunch
Post by felix_unger
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
Could you please make an effort not to carelessly conflate "proof" and
"evidence".
There's plenty of evidence. Probably every person who believes God exists
has experienced personal evidence in their own lives. They don't mention it much
to atheists since atheists deny that anything is evidence. Atheists are the most
clueless, and they take the easiest road possible even though that road
NECESSARILY involves being very comfortable with blatant dishonesty. Which
brings us back to the consistent FACT that atheists ARE EVIDENCE of God's
existence by being evidence that Satan is having influence on human minds.
true. and the irony of the atheist position is that they ridicule those
who do have a basis (evidence) for their beliefs, while having no
evidence for theirs.
Post by m***@.not.
Post by Free Lunch
Religions go out of their way to make excuses for why nothing they teach
about gods is supported by evidence.
That's a blatant lie from my pov,
he pulled it out of his rear end..
Post by m***@.not.
since I'm not aware of any. Try backing
your claim up with evidence that you're not lying.
Post by Free Lunch
Why should anyone believe a
religious teacher who spends all his time justifying why he teaches
something that he has no evidence for?
You're trying to "teach" people now. Provide your evidence that any
religious teacher "spends all his time justifying why he teaches something that
he has no evidence for." If you can provide that evidence then we can take it
from there. If/WHEN you can't provide that evidence we'll know that you lied
blatantly about something else you have no evidence for, and then we can take
THAT from there.
indeed!
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The right to free speech includes the right to offend"
m***@.not.
2014-11-04 00:35:17 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 09:11:56 +1100, felix_unger <***@nothere.biz> wrote:
.
Post by felix_unger
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
Apparently they can't even make an attempt. They've certainly shown that
they don't have any idea what they thought they were trying to talk about. It
seems that they're now aware of their position since they don't try to defend
themselves or their positon any more.
Free Lunch
2014-11-04 00:43:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.not.
.
Post by felix_unger
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
true!
Post by T***@tcher
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.
yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof
Apparently they can't even make an attempt. They've certainly shown that
they don't have any idea what they thought they were trying to talk about. It
seems that they're now aware of their position since they don't try to defend
themselves or their positon any more.
Go preach your religious nonsense elsewhere. You both know that you have
no evidence to support any claims about gods.
Sylvia Else
2014-11-02 12:32:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?

Sylvia.
Bob Casanova
2014-11-02 17:53:11 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of
religious texts, number of believers and arguments from
incredulity?
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
Malte Runz
2014-11-03 23:32:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of
religious texts, number of believers and arguments from
incredulity?
Don't forget the 'many documented miracles'.
--
Malte Runz
felix_unger
2014-11-04 06:06:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of
God's >> existence,
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented
with >> evidence
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been
presented?
Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of
religious texts, number of believers and arguments from
incredulity?
Don't forget the 'many documented miracles'.
yes
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The right to free speech includes the right to offend"
m***@.not.
2014-11-04 00:35:31 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 10:53:11 -0700, Bob Casanova <***@buzz.off> wrote:
.
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of
religious texts, number of believers and arguments from
incredulity?
What do you think there should be? Why can't you people give respectable
examples of what type(s) of evidence you think there should be in addition to
the evidence you deny? Why can't you say where it should be? Why can't you
explain why it should be available to humans? Why can't you say why you can't
say, even after it has been explained for you? The answer is that you're ashamed
of your failings as you should be, and you're ashamed of your shame, as again
you should be. ALL OF YOU!
Free Lunch
2014-11-04 00:52:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.not.
.
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of
religious texts, number of believers and arguments from
incredulity?
What do you think there should be? Why can't you people give respectable
examples of what type(s) of evidence you think there should be in addition to
the evidence you deny? Why can't you say where it should be? Why can't you
explain why it should be available to humans? Why can't you say why you can't
say, even after it has been explained for you? The answer is that you're ashamed
of your failings as you should be, and you're ashamed of your shame, as again
you should be. ALL OF YOU!
You never offered any evidence at all. Don't make excuses for your
dishonesty. Just because you allege that evidence exists, you have made
it clear that you know there is no such evidence and that you are being
dishonest in your attempt to deflect us from noting your dishonest
failure.

You preach a joke of a religion.
felix_unger
2014-11-04 06:12:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.not.
..
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of
religious texts, number of believers and arguments from
incredulity?
What do you think there should be? Why can't you people give respectable
examples of what type(s) of evidence you think there should be in addition to
the evidence you deny? Why can't you say where it should be? Why can't you
explain why it should be available to humans? Why can't you say why you can't
say, even after it has been explained for you? The answer is that you're ashamed
of your failings as you should be, and you're ashamed of your shame, as again
you should be. ALL OF YOU!
asking for physical evidence of non-physical entities is like asking
physical entities to behave like gods
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The right to free speech includes the right to offend"
m***@.not.
2014-11-04 00:35:26 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, Sylvia Else <***@not.at.this.address>
wrote:
.
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Why don't you do it, so we can see if you're aware of at least that much?
I'd also invite you to let us know what evidence you think there should be if
God exists, but by now we've learned that you haven't got the slightest clue
about that. You seem to think some should exist for some reason you can't
explain, yet you have no clue what it should be, where it should be, or why it
should be available to humans at all. Can you not appreciate how idiotic it is
for anyone to be in the position you're in, when just describing it is
hilarious?
Free Lunch
2014-11-04 00:50:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.not.
.
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Why don't you do it, so we can see if you're aware of at least that much?
I see that you have chosen, again, to engage in one of the favorite ways
that lying theists duck responsibility for the lies they tell. You run
away from the _fact_ that you have never offered any evidence that any
gods exist and that no one else has, either.
Post by m***@.not.
I'd also invite you to let us know what evidence you think there should be if
God exists, but by now we've learned that you haven't got the slightest clue
about that. You seem to think some should exist for some reason you can't
explain, yet you have no clue what it should be, where it should be, or why it
should be available to humans at all. Can you not appreciate how idiotic it is
for anyone to be in the position you're in, when just describing it is
hilarious?
You need to believe that even if a god exists that there never would be
any evidence, because you know there is no evidence.
Sylvia Else
2014-11-04 00:56:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.not.
.
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
Why don't you do it, so we can see if you're aware of at least that much?
The stuff I'm aware of pretty much matches the categories given by Bob,
and isn't real evidence.

So, do you have anything else?

Sylvia.
felix_unger
2014-11-04 05:54:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by T***@tcher
For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?
I guess you've never heard of Jesus Christ then?
Post by Sylvia Else
Sylvia.
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The right to free speech includes the right to offend"
Loading...