2014-10-31 20:05:14 UTC
when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with evidence
of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,
enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.
Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence
makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's
existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.
In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced their
complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge
presented to them by ***@.not The challenge was a simple one that they should be
able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could
address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so
entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they
think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God
should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge
resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have the
slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where he
should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are
clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their
cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the atheists
themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That
failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for
demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them to
be presented with.