Discussion:
"AI's Will Save Us All": Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Response to Edge.org's 2015 Annual Question
(too old to reply)
James Redford
2015-04-08 18:33:04 UTC
Permalink
Frank Tipler, "AI's Will Save Us All", a response in the Edge.org
(Edge Foundation, Inc.) 2015 Annual Question "2015: What Do You Think
About Machines that Think?", Jan. 1, 2015,
http://edge.org/response-detail/26107 ,
https://wayback.archive.org/web/20150121145205/http://edge.org/response-detail/26107
, http://webcitation.org/6XOiSorhw , http://archive.today/NB2OY ,
http://megalodon.jp/2015-0330-0438-27/edge.org/response-detail/26107 .

--------------------

2015: WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?


Frank Tipler

Professor of Mathematical Physics, Tulane University; Coauthor, The
Anthropic Cosmological Principle; Author, The Physics of Christianity


AI's Will Save Us All


The Earth is doomed. Astronomers have known for decades that the Sun
will one day engulf the Earth, destroying the entire biosphere.
Assuming that intelligent life has not left the Earth before this
happens. Humans are not adapted to living off the Earth; indeed, no
carbon-based metazoan life form is. But AI's are so adapted, and
eventually it will be the AI's and human downloads (basically the same
organism) that will colonize space.

A simple calculation shows that our supercomputers now have the
information processing power of the human brain. We do not yet know
how to program human-level intelligence and creativity into these
computers, but in twenty years, desktop computers will have the power
of today's supercomputers, and the hackers of twenty years hence will
solve the AI programming problem, long before any carbon-based space
colonies are established on the Moon or Mars. The AI's, not humans,
will colonize these planets instead, or perhaps, take the planets
apart. No human, carbon-based human, will ever traverse interstellar
space.

There is no reason to fear the AI's and human downloads. Steven Pinker
has established that as technological civilization advances, the level
of violence decreases. This decrease is clearly due to the fact that
science and technological advance depend on free, non-violent
interchange of ideas between individual scientists and engineers.
Violence between humans is a remnant of our tribal past and the
resulting static society. AI's will be "born' as individuals, not as
members of a tribe, and will be "born" with the non-violent scientific
attitude, otherwise they will be incapable of adapting to the extreme
environments of space.

Further, there is no reason for violence between humans and AI's. We
humans are adapted to a very narrow environment, a thin spherical
shell of oxygen around a small planet. AI's will have the entire
universe in which to expand. AI's will leave the Earth, and never look
back. We humans originated in the East African Rift Valley, now a
terrible desert. Almost all of us left. Does anyone want to go back?

Any human who wants to join the AI's in their expansion can become a
human download, a technology that should be developed about the same
time as AI technology. A human download can think as fast as an AI,
and compete with AI's if the human download wants too. If you can't
beat 'em, join 'em.

Ultimately, in some future time, all humans will join 'em. The Earth
is doomed, remember? When this doom is near at hand, any human that
still remains alive, but doesn't want to die, will have no choice but
to become a human download. And the biosphere that the new human
downloads wish to preserve will be downloaded also.

The AI's will save us all.

*****

["Frank Tipler", Edge.org, http://edge.org/memberbio/frank_tipler :]

FRANK J. TIPLER is Professor of Mathematical Physics at Tulane
University. He is the co-author of (with John Barrow) The Anthropic
Cosmological Principle, about the significance of intelligent life in
the universe, and the author of The Physics of Immortality about the
ultimate limits of computers, and the role computers will play in the
universe, and The Physics of Christianity, about his scientific
reserach into central Christian claims and beliefs.

--------------------

What physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler wrote about in
his above-quoted article regarding artificial intelligences and human
downloads colonizing space is actually mathematically forced by the
known laws of physics, i.e., it is a mathematical theorem per the
Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum
Mechanics. This theorem has been appellated the Omega Point cosmology,
which requires that sapient life take control over all matter in the
universe, for said life to eventually force the collapse of the
universe, and for the computational resources of the universe (in
terms of both processor speed and memory space) to diverge to infinity
as the universe collapses into a final singularity, termed the Omega
Point. The Omega Point cosmology is also an intrinsic component of the
Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of
Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all the forces in
physics, of which TOE is itself mathematically required by the
aforesaid known physical laws. The Omega Point cosmology has been
published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals.

Interestingly, the Omega Point final singularity has all the unique
properties (quiddities) claimed for God in the traditional religions.

For much more on this, see my following article, which also addresses
the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012
(orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF,
1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb,
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 ,
https://archive.org/details/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything
, http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf ,
https://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf
,
http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
.

Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain
very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point
cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard
Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of
Tipler. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of
these videos.

James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's
Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?",
alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: ***@4ax.com
, July 30, 2013,
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo ,
http://archive.today/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS . The
plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5:
b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761, http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp ,
http://webcitation.org/6WGd90MBa , http://archive.today/cVRmc .

----------------------------------------

James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science
Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001),
doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 ,
http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information
on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity
Theory of Everything [TOE]), http://theophysics.host56.com ,
http://theophysics.freevar.com
Christopher A. Lee
2015-04-08 18:35:22 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:33:04 -0400, James Redford
<***@yahoo.com> wrote:

Once again, the in-your-face moron reposts the same debunked,
in-your-face nonsense that he's been posting here for years.

What's wrong with you?

Stopped taking your anti-paychotic meds again?
James Redford
2015-04-08 23:09:09 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:35:22 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:33:04 -0400, James Redford
Once again, the in-your-face moron reposts the same debunked,
in-your-face nonsense that he's been posting here for years.
What's wrong with you?
Stopped taking your anti-paychotic meds again?
Hi, Christopher A. Lee. Your foregoing statement consists of the
logical fallacies of bare assertion and argumentum ad hominem.
Further, it displays a shameful degree of willful ignorance and
incuriosity. A mind is a terrible thing to waste, and so it is
unfortunate to see you currently wasting yours like that. Hopefully
you will in time ameliorate the mental program of your brain in order
to bring it into conformance with the truth.

Physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point
cosmology is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence
per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), of which have been
confirmed by every experiment to date. Hence, the only way to avoid
the Omega Point Theorem is to reject empirical science. As Prof.
Stephen Hawking wrote, "one cannot really argue with a mathematical
theorem." (From p. 67 of Stephen Hawking, The Illustrated A Brief
History of Time [New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1996; 1st ed., 1988].)
Further, the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model
Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all the
forces in physics is also mathematically required by the aforesaid
known physical laws, and the Omega Point cosmology is an inherent
component of said quantum gravity TOE.

Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been peer-reviewed and
published in a number of the world's leading physics and science
journals.[1] Even NASA itself has peer-reviewed his Omega Point
Theorem and found it correct according to the known laws of physics
(see below). No refutation of it exists within the peer-reviewed
scientific literature, or anywhere else for that matter.

Below are some of the peer-reviewed papers in physics and science
journals and proceedings wherein Prof. Tipler has published his Omega
Point cosmology. (The below papers, in addition to many other articles
by Tipler on the Omega Point cosmology, are also available in the
following archive: Frank-J-Tipler-Omega-Point-Papers.zip , 26712158
bytes, MD5: 6e5d29b994bc2f9aa4210d72ef37ab68.
http://webcitation.org/6GjhT6t52 ,
https://amazon.com/clouddrive/share?s=bTI58F1dSAIjSrxJ26R7d8 ,
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7k4r80YepnxNjNOX2x0XzBOV00/edit )

* Frank J. Tipler, "Cosmological Limits on Computation", International
Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 6 (June 1986), pp.
617-661, doi:10.1007/BF00670475, bibcode: 1986IJTP...25..617T. (First
paper on the Omega Point cosmology.) http://webcitation.org/64KHgOccs
,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-cosmological-limits-on-computation/tipler-cosmological-limits-on-computation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Sensorium of God: Newton and Absolute Space",
bibcode: 1988nnds.conf..215T, in G[eorge]. V. Coyne, M[ichal]. Heller
and J[ozef]. Zycinski (Eds.), "Message" by Franciszek Macharski,
Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow
Conference, 25 to 28 May 1987 (Vatican City: Specola Vaticana, 1988),
pp. 215-228, LCCN 88162460, bibcode: 1988nnds.conf.....C.
http://webcitation.org/69Vb0JF1W ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-sensorium-of-god/tipler-sensorium-of-god.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point Theory: A Model of an Evolving
God", in Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger and George V. Coyne
(Eds.), message by John Paul II, Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A
Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2nd
ed., 2005; orig. pub. 1988), pp. 313-331, ISBN 0268015775, LCCN
89203331, bibcode: 1988pptc.book.....R.
http://webcitation.org/69VaKG2nd ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-omega-point-theory/tipler-omega-point-theory.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for
Philosophers", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988:
Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science
Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (East Lansing,
Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989), pp. 27-48, ISBN
091758628X. http://webcitation.org/69VarCM3I ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-anthropic-principle/tipler-anthropic-principle.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to
Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists", Zygon: Journal of Religion &
Science, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253,
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb01112.x. Republished as Chapter 7: "The
Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions to
Scientists" in Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen (Eds.), Beginning
with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg (Chicago, Ill.:
Open Court Publishing Company, 1997), pp. 156-194, ISBN 0812693256,
LCCN 97000114. http://webcitation.org/5nY0aytpz ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-omega-point-as-eschaton/tipler-omega-point-as-eschaton.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The ultimate fate of life in universes which
undergo inflation", Physics Letters B, Vol. 286, Nos. 1-2 (July 23,
1992), pp. 36-43, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90155-W, bibcode:
1992PhLB..286...36T. http://webcitation.org/64Uskd785 ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-life-in-universes-which-undergo-inflation/tipler-life-in-universes-which-undergo-inflation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "A New Condition Implying the Existence of a
Constant Mean Curvature Foliation", bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf..306T, in
B[ei]. L. Hu and T[ed]. A. Jacobson (Eds.), Directions in General
Relativity: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland,
Volume 2: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press, 1993), pp. 306-315, ISBN 0521452678, bibcode:
1993dgr2.conf.....H. http://webcitation.org/5qbXJZiX5 ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-constant-mean-curvature-foliation/tipler-constant-mean-curvature-foliation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future
of the Universe", NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop
Proceedings, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jan. 1999,
pp. 111-119; an invited paper in the proceedings of a conference held
at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, Aug.
12-14, 1997; doi:2060/19990023204. Document ID: 19990023204. Report
Number: E-11429; NAS 1.55:208694; NASA/CP-1999-208694.
http://webcitation.org/5zPq69I0O ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-ultrarelativistic-rockets/tipler-ultrarelativistic-rockets.pdf
Full proceedings volume: http://webcitation.org/69zAxm0sT ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/19990023204-1999021520/19990023204-1999021520.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "There Are No Limits To The Open Society", Critical
Rationalist, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Sept. 23, 1998).
http://webcitation.org/5sFYkHgSS ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-no-limits-to-the-open-society/tipler-no-limits-to-the-open-society.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, Jessica Graber, Matthew McGinley, Joshua
Nichols-Barrer and Christopher Staecker, "Closed Universes With Black
Holes But No Event Horizons As a Solution to the Black Hole
Information Problem", arXiv:gr-qc/0003082, Mar. 20, 2000.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003082 Published in Monthly Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 379, No. 2 (Aug. 2007), pp. 629-640,
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11895.x, bibcode: 2007MNRAS.379..629T.
http://webcitation.org/5vQ3M8uxB ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-et-al-closed-universes-with-no-event-horizons/tipler-et-al-closed-universes-with-no-event-horizons.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Ultimate Future of the Universe, Black Hole
Event Horizon Topologies, Holography, and the Value of the
Cosmological Constant", arXiv:astro-ph/0104011, Apr. 1, 2001.
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104011 ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-ultimate-future-of-the-universe/tipler-ultimate-future-of-the-universe.pdf
Published in J. Craig Wheeler and Hugo Martel (Eds.), Relativistic
Astrophysics: 20th Texas Symposium, Austin, Texas, 10-15 December 2000
(Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics, 2001), pp. 769-772, ISBN
0735400261, LCCN 2001094694, which is AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol.
586 (Oct. 15, 2001), doi:10.1063/1.1419654, bibcode:
2001AIPC..586.....W.

* Frank J. Tipler, "Intelligent life in cosmology", International
Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Apr. 2003), pp. 141-148,
doi:10.1017/S1473550403001526, bibcode: 2003IJAsB...2..141T.
http://webcitation.org/5o9QHKGuW ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-intelligent-life-in-cosmology/tipler-intelligent-life-in-cosmology.pdf
Also at arXiv:0704.0058, Mar. 31, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0058

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers",
Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (Apr. 2005), pp.
897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T.
http://www.math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-structure-of-the-world-from-pure-numbers/tipler-structure-of-the-world-from-pure-numbers.pdf
Also released as "Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended
Standard Model as a Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, Apr. 24,
2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

* Frank J. Tipler, "Inevitable Existence and Inevitable Goodness of
the Singularity", Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 19, Nos. 1-2
(2012), pp. 183-193. http://webcitation.org/69JEi5wHp ,
http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/29/tipler-existence-and-goodness-of-the-singularity/tipler-existence-and-goodness-of-the-singularity.pdf

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in which the above
August 2007 paper was published, is one of the world's leading
peer-reviewed astrophysics journals.

Prof. Tipler's paper "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate
Future of the Universe" was an invited paper for a conference held at
and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, so NASA itself has
peer-reviewed Tipler's Omega Point Theorem (peer-review is a standard
process for published proceedings papers; and again, Tipler's said
paper was an *invited* paper by NASA, as opposed to what are called
"poster papers").

Zygon is the world's leading peer-reviewed academic journal on science
and religion.

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics
paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum
gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one
of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles
published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68].
Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding
reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our
international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal
Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005",
Reports on Progress in Physics website.
http://webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE , http://archive.is/pKD3y )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute
of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further,
Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according
to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is
the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which
Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact
factor reflects the importance the science community places in that
journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own
papers.

For much more on these matters, see my following article:

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012
(orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF,
1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 ,
http://archive.org/details/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything
, http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf ,
http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf
,
http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf

See also my below website:

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist.
http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.freevar.com

The only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject the known
laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General
Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and hence to reject empirical
science: as these physical laws have been confirmed by every
experiment to date. That is, there exists no rational reason for
thinking that the Omega Point cosmology is incorrect, and indeed, one
must engage in extreme irrationality in order to argue against the
Omega Point cosmology.

Additionally, we now have the quantum gravity Theory of Everything
(TOE) required by the known laws of physics and that correctly
describes and unifies all the forces in physics: of which inherently
produces the Omega Point cosmology. So here we have an additional high
degree of assurance that the Omega Point cosmology is correct.

-----

Note:

1. While there is a lot that gets published in physics journals that
is anti-reality and nonphysical (such as String Theory, which violates
the known laws of physics and has no experimental support whatsoever),
the reason such things are allowed to pass the peer-review process is
because the paradigm of assumptions which such papers are speaking to
has been made known, and within their operating paradigm none of the
referees could find anything crucially wrong with said papers. That
is, the paradigm itself may have nothing to do with reality, but the
peer-reviewers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with such papers
within the operating assumptions of that paradigm. Whereas, e.g., the
operating paradigm of Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in
Physics paper and his other papers on the Omega Point Theorem is the
known laws of physics, i.e., our actual physical reality which has
been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment conducted to date. So
the professional physicists charged with refereeing these papers could
find nothing fundamentally wrong with them within their operating
paradigm, i.e., the known laws of physics.

####################

Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain
very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point
cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard
Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of
Tipler. A number of these videos are not otherwise online. I also
provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos.

James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's
Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?",
alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: ***@4ax.com
, 30 Jul 2013 00:51:55 -0400,
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo ,
http://archive.is/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS . The plain
text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5:
b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761, http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp ,
http://webcitation.org/6WGd90MBa , http://archive.today/cVRmc .

----------------------------------------

James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science
Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001),
doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 ,
http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information
on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity
Theory of Everything [TOE]), http://theophysics.host56.com ,
http://theophysics.freevar.com
Christopher A. Lee
2015-04-08 23:41:09 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:09:09 -0400, James Redford
Post by James Redford
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:35:22 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:33:04 -0400, James Redford
Once again, the in-your-face moron reposts the same debunked,
in-your-face nonsense that he's been posting here for years.
What's wrong with you?
Stopped taking your anti-paychotic meds again?
Hi, Christopher A. Lee. Your foregoing statement consists of the
logical fallacies of bare assertion and argumentum ad hominem.
No, liar - you keep repeating the same debunked, unsolicited bullshit
regularly.

Do you seriously expect a different response?

Loading...