Discussion:
www.thescienceforum.com/ is a pussy forum you might love
(too old to reply)
m***@.
2015-12-14 05:52:20 UTC
Permalink
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run by
the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that challenges strong
atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to
take into consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with defeated
him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in
these forums. So you people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to
cowardly hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into consideration.
Smiler
2015-12-15 03:19:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
Bob Casanova
2015-12-15 17:25:02 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), the following
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
That seems to be the trend, along with PKB (Pot, Kettle,
Black) or MBE (Mote, Beam, Eye) Syndrome.

And BTW, killfiles are Your Friends (TM). ;-)
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
Smiler
2015-12-17 00:10:08 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), the following appeared in
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
That seems to be the trend, along with PKB (Pot, Kettle, Black) or MBE
(Mote, Beam, Eye) Syndrome.
And BTW, killfiles are Your Friends (TM). ;-)
I have too much fun knocking these loonies down to killfile them.
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
Bob Casanova
2015-12-17 17:28:14 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:10:08 +0000 (UTC), the following
Post by Smiler
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), the following appeared in
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
That seems to be the trend, along with PKB (Pot, Kettle, Black) or MBE
(Mote, Beam, Eye) Syndrome.
And BTW, killfiles are Your Friends (TM). ;-)
I have too much fun knocking these loonies down to killfile them.
Point... ;-)
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
Christopher A. Lee
2015-12-17 18:22:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Smiler
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), the following appeared in
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
That seems to be the trend, along with PKB (Pot, Kettle, Black) or MBE
(Mote, Beam, Eye) Syndrome.
And BTW, killfiles are Your Friends (TM). ;-)
I have too much fun knocking these loonies down to killfile them.
That got boring very quickly.
Christopher A. Lee
2015-12-15 17:47:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.

"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.

And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
Post by Smiler
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
Let me guess - the author doesn't put up with nonsense and treats
creationists etc as the pig-ignorant, uneducated morons they are which
they imagine is undeserved?
felix_unger
2015-12-17 09:24:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Smiler
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
Let me guess - the author doesn't put up with nonsense and treats
creationists etc as the pig-ignorant, uneducated morons they are which
they imagine is undeserved?
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White,
Diversity, multiculturalism, inclusive society, are all code words for White Genocide!
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
http://ausnet.info/islam/lakemba.html
the picture that shocked the world!.. Loading Image...
"No need for concern. Only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940 only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How did that turn out?"
"ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith"
-Barack Obama, idiotic President and Grand Imam of the USA
Bob Casanova
2015-12-17 17:29:00 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
No, he's not. But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Smiler
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
Let me guess - the author doesn't put up with nonsense and treats
creationists etc as the pig-ignorant, uneducated morons they are which
they imagine is undeserved?
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
Christopher A. Lee
2015-12-17 17:38:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
When this psycho crawl back out of the woodwork?
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Smiler
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Only to the stupid.

It's the frustrated and falsifiable response to morons who can't keep
their beliefs where they belong.

Which the dishonest, pathetic, lying little shit has had explained ove
and over again.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
And Unger can't stop lying.
Post by Bob Casanova
No, he's not. But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
These morons don't understand "put up or shut up", or the falsifiable
conclusion pending the evidence they never provide.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Smiler
You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
Let me guess - the author doesn't put up with nonsense and treats
creationists etc as the pig-ignorant, uneducated morons they are which
they imagine is undeserved?
felix_unger
2015-12-18 00:37:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
When this psycho crawl back out of the woodwork?
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Only to the stupid.
'there are no ghosts' is a belief that a person has. same for the others.
Post by Christopher A. Lee
It's the frustrated and falsifiable response to morons who can't keep
their beliefs where they belong.
Which the dishonest, pathetic, lying little shit
that would be you
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
And Unger can't stop lying.
prove it
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
No, he's not. But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
These morons don't understand "put up or shut up",
you can't understand that these are discussion groups.
felix_unger
2015-12-18 00:32:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof

http://ausnet.info/evidence
Post by Bob Casanova
But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White,
Diversity, multiculturalism, inclusive society, are all code words for White Genocide!
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
http://ausnet.info/islam/lakemba.html
the picture that shocked the world!.. http://ausnet.info/islam/hypocrisy.jpg
"No need for concern. Only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940 only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How did that turn out?"
"ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith"
-Barack Obama, idiotic President and Grand Imam of the USA
Bob Casanova
2015-12-18 18:22:05 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
something about the subject:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
Christopher A. Lee
2015-12-18 18:55:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
A stupid lie.

A falsifiable conclusion is not a belief - it's the only way to
treat ridiculous claims.

These morons can't grasp that saying "God did it" to an atheist or any
other non-Christian is the same as Jesper insisting Krishna did it to
Christians.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
Another stupid lie.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
So provide some of it, liar.

These liars have never provided anything remotely resembling evidence.

They claim it exists, and when cornered they offer a standard list
that has been debunked over and over again.
Post by Bob Casanova
Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
The proven serial liar knows this, because it has been pointed out
over and over again.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
It's a theist doing what theists do.
felix_unger
2015-12-19 00:50:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
A stupid lie.
"there is no (whatever)" is an assertion, a statement of belief that
something is true. idiot!
Post by Christopher A. Lee
A falsifiable conclusion is not a belief - it's the only way to
treat ridiculous claims.
These morons can't grasp that saying "God did it" to an atheist or any
other non-Christian is the same as Jesper insisting Krishna did it to
Christians.
I can
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
Another stupid lie.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
So provide some of it,
I don't need to because I don't claim there is any
Post by Christopher A. Lee
liar.
yes, you are!
Post by Christopher A. Lee
These liars have never provided anything remotely resembling evidence.
They claim it exists, and when cornered they offer a standard list
that has been debunked over and over again.
oh yes, very logical.. the evidence that doesn't exist can be debunked.
how does that work exactly?
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
The proven serial liar knows this, because it has been pointed out
over and over again.
see my reply to BobC. oh, that's right you can't. because you have me
blocked. but that doesn't stop you from commenting on what I say, but
without having to address any rebuttal. guess what that makes you.. a
fuckwit!
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
It's a theist doing what theists do.
it's an atheist doing what atheists do.. hate!

might I suggest that you stick with the abuse and insults because you
suck at logic and reason!
Bob Casanova
2015-12-19 18:01:14 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:55:41 -0600, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
A stupid lie.
A falsifiable conclusion is not a belief - it's the only way to
treat ridiculous claims.
These morons can't grasp that saying "God did it" to an atheist or any
other non-Christian is the same as Jesper insisting Krishna did it to
Christians.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
Another stupid lie.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
So provide some of it, liar.
These liars have never provided anything remotely resembling evidence.
They claim it exists, and when cornered they offer a standard list
that has been debunked over and over again.
Post by Bob Casanova
Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
The proven serial liar knows this, because it has been pointed out
over and over again.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
It's a theist doing what theists do.
Not all theists are like him. I've known many who accept
science in scientific fields while still believing in a
deity, but they're rational enough to not usually post their
beliefs in Usenet, at least not in groups dedicated to
scientific investigation such as sci.skeptic. They know that
science doesn't deal with unsupported belief regarding
things which are inherently not susceptible to scientific
investigation. It's a self-selective process, and the losers
(multiple meanings) post here.
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
felix_unger
2015-12-19 22:24:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:55:41 -0600, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
A stupid lie.
A falsifiable conclusion is not a belief - it's the only way to
treat ridiculous claims.
These morons can't grasp that saying "God did it" to an atheist or any
other non-Christian is the same as Jesper insisting Krishna did it to
Christians.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
Another stupid lie.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
So provide some of it, liar.
These liars have never provided anything remotely resembling evidence.
They claim it exists, and when cornered they offer a standard list
that has been debunked over and over again.
Post by Bob Casanova
Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
The proven serial liar knows this, because it has been pointed out
over and over again.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
But *you* are confusing evidence with
anecdote.
It's a theist doing what theists do.
Not all theists are like him.
you don't know what I am
Post by Bob Casanova
I've known many who accept
science in scientific fields while still believing in a
deity, but they're rational enough to not usually post their
beliefs in Usenet, at least not in groups dedicated to
scientific investigation such as sci.skeptic.
I replied to a post by YOU in alt.agnosticism. so one might just as well
ask why are you posting your scientific stuff in alt.agnosticism?
Post by Bob Casanova
They know that
science doesn't deal with unsupported belief regarding
things which are inherently not susceptible to scientific
investigation. It's a self-selective process, and the losers
(multiple meanings) post here.
felix_unger
2015-12-19 00:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
Sorry,
you should be... :)
Post by Bob Casanova
but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
but we are/were not talking about evidence constituting scientific
proof, we were talking about evidence in general. there was never any
mention of your so-called scientific proof. and you say there is no such
thing as proof, yet cite what is tantamount to proof as being required!.
but of course there is such a thing as proof. conclusive evidence
amounts to proof. you're just creating a red herring to try to justify
denying the existence of any evidence for those things. and we know why
atheists do that. so they can deny there is any evidence for the
existence of God.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
these may help you keep on track..

evidence for ghosts: http://tinyurl.com/nm2kldx (29 million hits)

evidence for UFO's: http://tinyurl.com/h9rofds (2.7 million hits)

evidence for god: http://tinyurl.com/havebuk (174 million hits)

but poor old psychics only get less than half a million:
http://tinyurl.com/zukvv4v

and while I have your attention.. might I suggest that science does not
provide an explanation for everything. how would science explain the
appreciation of art, or 'gut feeling' for example?
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White,
Diversity, multiculturalism, inclusive society, are all code words for White Genocide!
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
http://ausnet.info/islam/lakemba.html
the picture that shocked the world!.. http://ausnet.info/islam/hypocrisy.jpg
"No need for concern. Only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940 only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How did that turn out?"
"ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith"
-Barack Obama, idiotic President and Grand Imam of the USA
Bob Casanova
2015-12-19 18:11:46 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:35:35 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
Sorry,
you should be... :)
Post by Bob Casanova
but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
but we are/were not talking about evidence constituting scientific
proof
That's implied by the group in which I'm reading your post;
it isn't sci.skeptic because it's about philosophy or
semantics. Write that on your hand.
Post by felix_unger
, we were talking about evidence in general. there was never any
mention of your so-called scientific proof. and you say there is no such
thing as proof, yet cite what is tantamount to proof as being required!.
Nope, and your insistence that evidence and proof are
synonymous simply reinforces the fact that you're
scientifically illiterate (not a flame; you're far from
unique in that).
Post by felix_unger
but of course there is such a thing as proof. conclusive evidence
amounts to proof. you're just creating a red herring to try to justify
denying the existence of any evidence for those things. and we know why
atheists do that. so they can deny there is any evidence for the
existence of God.
Post the evidence. Remember that it must be objective; no
"the Bible says" anecdote.
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
these may help you keep on track..
No need; I'm still on track. Any of those provide objective
evidence? You *do* know what "objective" means, right?
Post by felix_unger
evidence for ghosts: http://tinyurl.com/nm2kldx (29 million hits)
evidence for UFO's: http://tinyurl.com/h9rofds (2.7 million hits)
evidence for god: http://tinyurl.com/havebuk (174 million hits)
http://tinyurl.com/zukvv4v
and while I have your attention.. might I suggest that science does not
provide an explanation for everything. how would science explain the
appreciation of art, or 'gut feeling' for example?
It doesn't, except in a *very* general way. Nor does it
explain anything else it can't investigate using the methods
of science, including the existence of deities which use
their abilities to stay hidden; they may or may not exist,
but we have no way to verify either. Is that a problem for
you? It shouldn't be, since you've chosen to post in a sci
newsgroup.
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
felix_unger
2015-12-19 22:23:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:35:35 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
Post by felix_unger
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by m***@.
You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
into consideration.
How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
non-event, even strong atheism.
"There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
those are all beliefs
Post by Christopher A. Lee
And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
is obvious.
you're confusing evidence with proof
No, he's not.
yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
evidence that will create proof
Sorry,
you should be... :)
Post by Bob Casanova
but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
such evidence has been presented.
but we are/were not talking about evidence constituting scientific
proof
That's implied by the group in which I'm reading your post;
it isn't sci.skeptic because it's about philosophy or
semantics. Write that on your hand.
and shove this up your arse!.. I am reading and posting in
alt.agnosticism. YOU are posting here. a nice attempt at avoidance, but
the fact remains that this was never about any scientific
interpretations. If you don't want to see my replies to your comments
then DON'T POST IN ALT.AGNOSTICISM. you can safely post in sci.septic
without fear of criticism or rebuttal from me.
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
, we were talking about evidence in general. there was never any
mention of your so-called scientific proof. and you say there is no such
thing as proof, yet cite what is tantamount to proof as being required!.
Nope, and your insistence that evidence and proof are
synonymous simply reinforces the fact that you're
scientifically illiterate (not a flame; you're far from
unique in that).
Post by felix_unger
but of course there is such a thing as proof. conclusive evidence
amounts to proof. you're just creating a red herring to try to justify
denying the existence of any evidence for those things. and we know why
atheists do that. so they can deny there is any evidence for the
existence of God.
Post the evidence. Remember that it must be objective; no
"the Bible says" anecdote.
It's been done over an over, and I know you have seen and commented in
the past, so I'm not going to indulge you just so you can say 'that's
not evidence'. and haven't you just been grizzling about ppl posting
stuff that isn't about science? so why are you even asking? but you can
look here if you're REALLY interested.. http://tinyurl.com/havebuk
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
Post by Bob Casanova
Post by felix_unger
http://ausnet.info/evidence
Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
these may help you keep on track..
No need; I'm still on track. Any of those provide objective
evidence? You *do* know what "objective" means, right?
Post by felix_unger
evidence for ghosts: http://tinyurl.com/nm2kldx (29 million hits)
evidence for UFO's: http://tinyurl.com/h9rofds (2.7 million hits)
evidence for god: http://tinyurl.com/havebuk (174 million hits)
http://tinyurl.com/zukvv4v
and while I have your attention.. might I suggest that science does not
provide an explanation for everything. how would science explain the
appreciation of art, or 'gut feeling' for example?
It doesn't, except in a *very* general way. Nor does it
explain anything else it can't investigate using the methods
of science, including the existence of deities which use
their abilities to stay hidden; they may or may not exist,
but we have no way to verify either.
right. so science doesn't have an answer for everything. keep that in mind.
Post by Bob Casanova
Is that a problem for you?
no, not at all. but it might be a problem for someone who want's to
believe that science can explain everything. science is a discipline.
just like mathematics, or philosophy. science does what science does, so
it should stick to that.
Post by Bob Casanova
It shouldn't be, since you've chosen to post in a sci
newsgroup.
--
rgds,

Pete
-------
Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White,
Diversity, multiculturalism, inclusive society, are all code words for White Genocide!
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
http://ausnet.info/islam/lakemba.html
the picture that shocked the world!.. http://ausnet.info/islam/hypocrisy.jpg
"No need for concern. Only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940 only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How did that turn out?"
"ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith"
-Barack Obama, idiotic President and Grand Imam of the USA
Loading...